Dining Over the Gap: Viewpoints on Migration and Society
Introducing the Individuals
Stephen, 64, Canvey Island
Occupation: Former insurance professional
Political history: Typically Conservative, except when he lived in a left-leaning London borough and supported the SDP
Interesting fact: His specialty in underwriting was kidnap and ransom: People often claim that insurance is dull, but it’s not when you’re discussing rescuing people from the Korean peninsula because the North Koreans have opened the missile silos”
Eva, twenty-five, London
Profession: Psychology graduate
Voting record: In her native land, Aotearoa, she voted a combination of Labour and Green
Interesting fact: Eva has worked as a singer on cruise ships; her most extended voyage was six months, which is a long time to be on a boat
For starters
Eva: Steve seemed focused on enjoying the meal, to be open
Steve: She came across as a very intelligent, articulate, pleasant person
She: I had a caprese salad, pasta with fungi, and a rich sweet treat, it was very good
Key disagreement
Eva: He was definitely on the side of immigration being curtailed. He believes that British people who already live here, not just Caucasian Britons, face limited access to the things that they need, because more and more people are arriving. Whereas I just don’t think the figures are that bad
Steve: I’m for skilled immigration, I don’t want to live in a homogeneous, WASP country with tepid ale. But I believe that authorities have used immigration to fill the jobs they struggle to staff without increasing salaries. Wages are suppressed, so levies have to be kept low, so we are unable to improve services – spend more money on child support, on schooling, on technology
She: I am not deeply informed of the EU referendum, because I was 16 and abroad when it happened. He explained it to me in a new light. He told me about “posted workers” – candidates could arrive in the UK and receive solely the wage of the country they came from
He: The French president spent 24 months getting the EU to abolish the scheme; it was revised in two thousand eighteen. Before that, migrant laborers coming in were undermining British workers. Under the former PM, it was petroleum staff that were brought in; since then it’s been service industry, farms. She understood that, because she’d worked on a cruise ship and said she was paid a lot more than workers from other countries
Common ground
Steve: It would be ideal to have a different energy source, transition from fossil fuels. I don’t like pollution, I value fresh atmosphere, I love the countryside. We found consensus on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of Norway?” Their energy revenues soared after the conflict began, they used that money to develop green infrastructure
She: So we’re using their oil. You can see that’s an unfavorable approach to go about things. He was in favour of maintaining domestic drilling for the small amount we’ll need in the future. I kind of agree with him. We’re still going to rely on air travel. We both think we should be moving towards greener solutions, turbine fields and water power
Dessert topics
Eva: We briefly discussed anti-Muslim sentiment, though we avoided labeling it. He seemed worried by radical ideologies entering – he did note that a many individuals in the Arab world were extremist, which I felt was not accurate. I think it’s prejudiced to make judgments based on religion
Steve: I hail from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to that district, and she said it had been modernized. Obviously, I would say that: full of yuppies. But when I go down Chrisp Street market, I look like a foreigner. People stare at me because it’s become predominantly Islamic. She gave a slight glance at me about that. I used the word “ghetto”. Eva’s got Polish-Jewish ancestry – she objects to the term, to her it implies poverty. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes their own.” I agreed to use a alternative term – maybe enclave?
She: I feel like Muslim people are really disproportionately shown in the media as engaging in misconduct. It seems a little bit discriminatory, or xenophobic
Takeaway
He: I think we separated amicably. We had a embrace at the station
She: We both said that we’d had a wonderful evening